May as well learn the right assumptions when figuring this stuff out. NET app without a Framework/CLR of some kind. It may be possible, but I would say that especially for beginners it's better to just assume that no, you cannot run a. 13 years, 5 months ago I agree that it's not a particularly good idea. If it were licensed under the plain old GPL, then you would have to open source all your code. Am I correct? Also how large do the binaries become? 13 years, 5 months ago - not with the LGPL. But since the framework dlls are LGPL, then your application must be open sourced. 13 years, 5 months ago Hmm very interesting. Not that I think this is a good idea - it's bug-prone, it will balloon the size of your app, and really in the end - what have you won? But it appears to be possible. 13 years, 5 months ago Actually, there are some tools out there that claim to allow you to statically link all the necessary bits and bytes to your app, and then run that on a clean e.g. It's not that easy to detect the components I need to install and therefore I want a solution that doesn't require the. 13 years, 5 months ago Because I need to install the software in windows 2000 systems and I don't want to install the framework. NET? 13 years, 5 months ago I would rather back Mono's implementation and see the MS. Slim-installation? some sort of strange device? secret project at a Java company with corporate policy detecting. net is free 13 years, 5 months ago What is your situation? Perhaps there is a solution that isn't what you're asking. 13 years, 5 months ago Thx Joel, didn't know, great. net-2.0 Comments 13 years, 5 months ago mono will run on windows, too. They can even add it to machines automatically via group policy deployment if they have to.ġ0 years, 4 months ago Related Topics deployment. But business environments don't usually have a problem installing the. On the other hand, an awful lot of businesses still use windows 2000 machines in large numbers. You're more likely to see as windows 98 machine in a home than windows 2000, and not even Microsoft still supports windows 98. Home users ended up with (shudder)Windows ME instead, which was released about the same time, and for that reason have almost completely moved on to Windows XP. Are you deploying to business or home environments?Īlmost no home users have windows 2000. I'm also a little curious as to your windows 2000 requirement. That will install just fine on windows 2000 with no trouble, and you can target it from Visual Studio 2008 if you need to. Of course, that limits you to the mono implementation of the framework, which is getting better but is still incomplete in a few places.īased on your various comments, my best suggestion is to use version 2.0 of the framework. You can use mono to static-link all the framework dlls you need.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. Archives
January 2023
Categories |